Die-hard fan I see. Every software needs faithful users like you.
Way to go
I’m glad to hear that the FF speed has increased, not that it’s that slow now.
When I look at how much memory FF uses, it’s sometimes enormous. I do run a number of plugins, and that may be causing some of that. I use Firebug, fire.fm, WOT, and Adblock, and maybe they "leak" a bit.
That aside, in your opinion, will FF keep needing to use even more memory for speed and other performance, or can/will that also be optimized?
Cheers, Dave
Treigh,
Quote from: samba at Jul 14, 2010, 11:01 AM
I’m glad to hear that the FF speed has increased, not that it’s that slow now.
When I look at how much memory FF uses, it’s sometimes enormous. I do run a number of plugins, and that may be causing some of that. I use Firebug, fire.fm, WOT, and Adblock, and maybe they "leak" a bit.
That aside, in your opinion, will FF keep needing to use even more memory for speed and other performance, or can/will that also be optimized?
Cheers, Dave
Dave, I think FF is seriously leaning toward increased speed and low memory usage. From my reading of their statements, it becomes clear that they understand that those who love Chrome do so because it acts faster and it looks prettier. I’m convinced FF is determined to take the speed fame away from the new kind on the block. Anyone else?
Quote from: treigh at Jul 14, 2010, 09:58 AM
Die-hard fan I see. Every software needs faithful users like you.
Way to go
It’s just kind of become my favorite browser for a number of reasons. I wouldn’t cry if it suddenly went away, but I do like it.
In my opinion, the real die-hards are the open-source finatics.
Still waiting to see what IE9 will look like. They’re also bragging about itYou mean like they bragged about Windows ME and Vista?
Still waiting to see what IE9 will look like. They’re also bragging about itYou mean like they bragged about Windows ME and Vista?
This discussion is closed to further replies. Keep calm and carry on.