Any ideas? I thought it might be because I had stripped out some necessary JavaScript when I created my template, but I tried it with the "Minimal Template" and had the same problem.
I think I’ve finally settled on "slidebox" as the gallery type I want to use. Everything works fine in Firefox, but, in IE, the pictures pop up in the box, but there is no dark overlay behind it. How can I get that to work?
Thanks for the detective work, haven’t tested it with spaces in filenames myself! I’ll put this issue to the todo list.
I discovered what was causing my problem with not having the "next" and "back" navigation in slidebox. For some reason, if any of the filenames for the images have spaces and/or ampersands ("&") in them, this causes trouble with the navigation. Not sure why, but I know it does. I changed my filenames to get rid of the offending characters, re-uploaded images, and now it works!
Hi, could you give a link to the site? It’s a css issue. You should see atleast this at the source of the page:
Quote from: ddecjc at Apr 12, 2006, 02:59 PMAny ideas? I thought it might be because I had stripped out some necessary JavaScript when I created my template, but I tried it with the "Minimal Template" and had the same problem.
I think I’ve finally settled on "slidebox" as the gallery type I want to use. Everything works fine in Firefox, but, in IE, the pictures pop up in the box, but there is no dark overlay behind it. How can I get that to work?
<!--[if gte IE 5.5]>
<![if lt IE 7]>
<style type="text/css">
* html #overlay{
background-color: #333;
back\ground-color: transparent;
background-image: url(assets/snippets/maxigallery/slidebox/blank.gif);
filter: progid:DXImageTransform.Microsoft.AlphaImageLoader (src="assets/snippets/maxigallery/slidebox/overlay.png", sizingMethod="scale");
</style>
<![endif]>
<![endif]-->
Site URL sent via PM. Thanks for checking it out. This is an awesome snippet, and I’m looking forward to getting it fully functional on my site!
Hi, could you give a link to the site?
Quote from: Marc at Apr 11, 2006, 06:26 AMI’ll put that in for the next version as an option, altough it doesn’t protect much as Mike said.. people can still get a copy of your pictures if they want quite easily.
Hi,
In my post, I thought of the technique of neutralization by the clic right even if this technique is quite relative. It is already about a limitation. The other techniques fall within the competence of the webmaster.
If you want to protect your pictures for sure, the best way would be to make a very transparent watermark image and set it to the center of your images. So you’d need to add &pic_use_watermark=`1` &pic_watermark_valign=`center` &pic_watermark_halign=`center` &pic_watermark_img=`path/to/your/watermark.png` to your snippetcall to achieve this.
I almost hate to say it Doze, but how hard do you think it would be to incorporate table contained comments for individual pics?
Another point: In the description of an image, the Utf-8 encoding is not recognized. An accentuated character as the ’ é’ (in French) is translated into ’é’
I tested the solution: it generates an image increased and not protected by the copy.Sorry, but I don’t understand what you are saying..
Could you post your snippet call and a site where I could see the results, if you are having problems?That option is to show an original/bigger version of some picture in a gallery and it’s not supposed to have the next/prev links. It could be built to have them, but I didn’t think that it would be needed. What you guys think about it, is it needed?
I have one question: Why in the presentation of the gallery in ’ dropshadow and imagemasking ’, once the image increased, one does not find the links ’ Next’ and ’ Previous’ as in embedded gallery?
It must be what mike is saying, charset support has been added to php htmlentities function at PHP 4.1.0. I could do an option that the charset from modx will be used if enabled.. and possibility to define the charset in the snippet call also. I’ll look into this.
Another point: In the description of an image, the Utf-8 encoding is not recognized. An accentuated character as the ’ é’ (in French) is translated into ’é’
Not yet, but it’s planned.
Last point: Can one modify the presentation of the gallery by using a chunk for example? What do you think about it?
A parameter that allows me to specify one or more web user names or group names that have permission to manage a gallery.Yes, I will need this myself also in some point, so definitely gonna do it.
Another thing that would be great is if "childgalleries" were able to go more than one level deep to look for galleries. It appears that it only goes down one level right now.Haven’t done anything to the childgalleries display option yet (other than made it use makeUrl api), because I haven’t needed it
..but I’ll look into this at some point.Not that hard, I’ll put it to the todo list, but not gonna happen very soon (unless someone else is willing to help), as you can see, there’s lots of other things to do also
I almost hate to say it Doze, but how hard do you think it would be to incorporate table contained comments for individual pics?
(other than possibility to disable rightclicking. for the people who are thinking to use it, read this in the meantime )
This discussion is closed to further replies. Keep calm and carry on.