WebLoginPE (1.3.0): Advanced WebUser Management and Extended Profiling.

Quote from: Soshite at Sep 03, 2007, 04:49 PM

Just to check --- the "manage" addition for special Admin. only profile fields + user list sorting would likely be in the next version of WLPE, right?

Here is the plan:
1) implement a "Manage" type where you can edit other user fields (You could reveal user fields in this form that are not viewable on the standard profile form, if you wanted to).

2) User page sorting and filtering, possibility for multiple lists per page.

3) True inter-user messaging system where messages are stored in a database table instead of using direct email contact (the recipient would get an email from your server saying they have a new personal message).

4) And of course I will try to fix any bugs that you guys report.

I am going to be completely swamped for the next three days, but I would like to get that next version out by the weekend or early next week.

-sD-
Dr. Scotty Delicious, Scientist.

Ooh, a PM system. Very cool. I’m guessing eventually that’ll have a Inbox/Outbox-type system, like a forum? That would be awsome.

This weekend/next week...that was earlier than I was expecting. Best of wishes on coding all that. ^.^

Quote from: Soshite at Sep 03, 2007, 06:08 PM

I’m guessing eventually that’ll have a Inbox/Outbox-type system, like a forum? That would be awsome.

That’s the plan
I figure as soon as we are all happy with WebLoginPE I can finish up working on SMXF (Simple MODx Forum), probably using WebLoginPE and Jot, but maybe eventually containing it’s own forum commenting system (only needing WebLoginPE for user management). I am not sure yet.

-sD-
Dr. Scotty Delicious, Scientist DFPA.

SMXF sounds really neat.

Man, I wish I knew half the PHP you did. You’re like a freakin PHP god or something.

ُCool,... SMXF would be gerat and most wanted (but never existed) feature i think!.

Why not using that great, grown-up software SMF?

Quote from: Konsum at Sep 03, 2007, 08:35 PM

Why not using that great, grown-up software SMF?

Personally im more comfortable with inbuilt functions instead of having bridges to take care of.

Quote from: Soshite at Sep 03, 2007, 08:20 PM

SMXF sounds really neat.

Man, I wish I knew half the PHP you did. You’re like a freakin PHP god or something.

Nah... Just a PHP Pirate. OpenGeek is the PHP god. He has taught me so much that it is mind bending

Quote from: Konsum at Sep 03, 2007, 08:35 PM

Why not using that great, grown-up software SMF?

Because WebLoginPE is shaping up to be an incredible way to manage lots and lots of users... the backbone of a forum.
Some people are going to want a full forum suite, but then some people just want to register users and provide an simple environment for them to exchange ideas as a community. I can see SMxF growing into a full fledged forum extension for MODx, but for now it is just a little baby idea that I have for creating a cozy community on your site, 100% MODx powered!

Quote from: MotSmart at Sep 03, 2007, 08:45 PM

Personally im more comfortable with inbuilt functions instead of having bridges to take care of.

Exactly!

-sD-
Dr. Scotty Delicious, Scientist DFPA.

Question: Does WebLoginPE play nicely when PHx is enabled?


OTHER:

1. I found a typo upon failed login attempt ($wlpe_lang[20]) (v.1.2.0):

Your password was incorrect.

Your Failed login count is 1. You will be blocked for 60 minutes for more than 3 failed attampts.

attampts should be attempts

2. Also, $wlpe_lang[100] contains "for for details", should be just "for details"

3. In the failed login message ($wlpe_lang[20]), it links to &service=forgot, but doesn’t get recognized as a result of the missing question mark. Should be ?service=forgot

Quote from: pixelchutes at Sep 04, 2007, 09:45 AM

Question: Does WebLoginPE play nicely when PHx is enabled?

From what I understand, PHx has a huge problem with any form using "[~[*id*]~]" and WebLoginPE uses that a lot.
I am going to speculate that unless PHx can learn to play nice with this tv link, PHx is not going to work with WebLoginPE < or = 1.2.0
I never really thought about that until you brought it up, but I will fix WebLoginPE so it can play with PHx. Put that on high priority for the next version.
Quote from: pixelchutes at Sep 04, 2007, 09:45 AM

NOTE:

I found a typo upon failed login attempt (v.1.2.0):

Your password was incorrect.

Your Failed login count is 1. You will be blocked for 60 minutes for more than 3 failed attampts.

attampts should be attempts

Also, $wlpe_lang[100] contains "for for details", should be just "for details"

Ha! Thanks for the proofreading! I will get that corrected for the next version.

-sD-
Dr. Scotty Delicious, Scientist DFPA.