Ambivilence. I’ve seen some good documentation wikis, and some really bad ones. But it would make it easier and more likely to grow, especially if they allow comments. Would need a lot of moderating.
Wow! That was fast. So is the "commenting" system the most likely choice for our existing documentation then?
Whatever the head honchos decide will be fine with me. I would go for a wiki, but I’m known as an anarchist in certain circles anyway.