-
MODX Staff
- 1,535 Posts
I’m using the latest OOo developer version on the Mac (uses Aqua - although it’s far from being fully implemented, at least it ditches X-windows)
For what I use it for (not a lot really), the Aqua version seems stable enough. Wouldn’t recommend using for any serious stuff just yet though ... if stability is a must then it’s best to go with NeoOffice for the time being.
Garry Nutting
Senior Developer
MODX, LLC
Email:
[email protected]
Twitter: @garryn
Web: modx.com
-
MODX Staff
- 730 Posts
I switched to OpenOffice back when I was on Windows.
It was part of my migration-to-linux strategy, which was to switch my main workflow aps to linux-compatible ones (including Thunderbird, OOo, Zend IDE, PersonalBrain). When I finally made the switch, I hardly felt like I was using a new OS at all.
-
MODX Staff
- 2,502 Posts
Been Using OO since it was still StarOffice and prefer it to M$ Office both for price and just because I don’t really use an office app that often and native output to PDF (while available as a printer add on for Windoze is still nice) is great.
In version 2.X there have been many improvements and have always been able to open a document written in MS Word (mainly because so few people actually know how to use most of the complex features--hell most people can’t even figure our tab settings).
I agree with the slowness under X on Mac as it is weighty just to read a doc but again Office is pricy. My wife mainly uses my MacBook and so I will let her know about NeoOffice or the other option that Scotty mentioned.
Personally, If I was deploying (used to be a systems admin) Windows PCs I would only do so with Open Office as it is feature by feature compatible for 90% of applications.
All the best,
Jay
Author of zero books. Formerly of many strange things. Pairs well with meats. Conversations are magical experiences. He's dangerous around code but a markup
magician.
Blog ✦
Twitter ✦
LinkedIn ✦
GitHub