We launched new forums in March 2019—join us there. In a hurry for help with your website? Get Help Now!
    • 25260
    • 156 Posts
    hi mIDO,

    as of 5/5/09, we are still using MODx and trying it.
    Everyone seems really impressed by it, and I think and hope that MODx will be choose instead of TYPO3.
    I can tell you that the results that we’re achieving with MODx in a couple of weeks are far and far away from the one we achieved with TYPO3.
    Just because MODx is very intuitive, instead of TYPO3 that is really hard to get working.

    In 1 or 2 weeks we will decide, but it seems like MODX really can kick TYPO3 outta here tongue

    Bye!
      • 25260
      • 156 Posts
      Hi, I’m posting just to inform you that we chose MODx.

      It beats TYPO3 for a couple of reasons:

      1) Templating is really simple, whereas with TYPO3 you have to learn TypoScript.
      2) Very intuitive backend, with almost the same functionalities as TYPO3.
      3) Immediately operative. With TYPO3, before you can make something, you have to spend a lot of time learning it.
      4) Creating snippets for custom behaviors is quite simple, thanks to MODx API and the use of PHP.

      Bye!
        • 16278
        • 928 Posts
        laugh Congratulations! But let’s hope that’s "au revoir", not "Bye!"??
        KP
          • 25260
          • 156 Posts
          Obviously smiley
            • 3749
            • 24,544 Posts
            Welcome to the MODx community. smiley
              Did I help you? Buy me a beer
              Get my Book: MODX:The Official Guide
              MODX info for everyone: http://bobsguides.com/modx.html
              My MODX Extras
              Bob's Guides is now hosted at A2 MODX Hosting
              • 20778
              • 3 Posts
              you can also consider typolight
              it’s very nice cms system(at the same time modex is alos very good one,i think modx,typolight,expressenngine is the top 3 cms)
              www.typolight.org
                • 22078
                • 9 Posts
                Quote from: Roberto at Jun 03, 2009, 03:19 AM

                Hi, I’m posting just to inform you that we chose MODx.

                It beats TYPO3 for a couple of reasons:

                1) Templating is really simple, whereas with TYPO3 you have to learn TypoScript.
                2) Very intuitive backend, with almost the same functionalities as TYPO3.
                3) Immediately operative. With TYPO3, before you can make something, you have to spend a lot of time learning it.
                4) Creating snippets for custom behaviors is quite simple, thanks to MODx API and the use of PHP.

                Bye!

                I’m currently exploring the advantages of MODx in comparison to TYPO3 which I’m productively working with. I’m quite new to MODx, and one of the main reasons why i’m interested in MODx is that it seems to be really VERY FAST, while i have to admit not to have built a more complex test site to proof if that promising performance is always true...

                As regards TYPO3 i have to disagree to some of your statements:

                1) Templating is really simple, whereas with TYPO3 you have to learn TypoScript.

                That is not true, if you have installed the extension "TemplaVoila". For me TemplaVoila was the ticket to TYPO3! Once you have understood the way how it works, which in fact isn’t hard at all, and templating is VERY easy. Just take any HTML layout you like - you don’t even have to put any placeholder code or any php stuff into that template -, just define, with the help of a few mouse clicks, where you want to have dynamic content, menu or submenu(s). That’s all.


                2) Very intuitive backend, with almost the same functionalities as TYPO3.

                As far as i can see now... for me this is not really true. While i have to admit, that an interface you are familiar with will always seem to be more "intuitive" than any other one. For me, the backend of TYPO3 is one of the most intuitive interfaces i’ve ever seen (i’ve been working productively with Joomla, Contenido, DerDirigent, Sefrengo, TYPO3, i have tried WebsiteBaker, Concrete and Drupal).

                3) Immediately operative. With TYPO3, before you can make something, you have to spend a lot of time learning it.

                Partly i have to disagree here. Since i’m new to MODx, i can tell about having A LOT to learn, a lot to explore regarding both terminology and workflow, before getting a first test site up and running.
                Well, maybe one have to spend more time to learn how TYPO3 works. My experience with TYPO3 has been so far, that nothing worked "out of the box". One always have to know EXACTLY HOW to get things done. But once you know, it’s actually very easy! It’s always a good idea to keep notes for future needs. Every time i learn something about TYPO3 i write down everything, i’m still keeping that habit, it helps me a lot.

                Actually, "immediately operative" isn’t true for both systems.

                4) Creating snippets for custom behaviors is quite simple, thanks to MODx API and the use of PHP.

                Currently i’m finding out how true this is with MODx. On the other hand, there are thousands of modules for TYPO3, for each and every purpose, so you don’t have to do any handicrafts at all...
                When you start with TYPO3, one of the most important and time consuming things is: configuration. It’s not that so much had to be done, it’s just HOW configuration has to be done. Once you know, you find it easy an logical.
                Michael
                  • 25260
                  • 156 Posts
                  Thank for the reply, quite interesting but too late laugh

                  I’ve already started developing in MODx tongue
                    • 22078
                    • 9 Posts
                    Great to hear, Roberto. TYPO3 is very powerful, but it is also quite slow. It needs dedicated servers to run smoothly. MODx seems to me to be VERY fast, even on shared servers. So your choice might have been a good one.

                    cheers,
                    Michael
                      • 25260
                      • 156 Posts
                      I must admit that I’m a coder (luckily, not only PHP tongue)and one of my teammates is a HTML/CSS coder, so when we want MODx to act like/to show like something, we don’t have problems tongue

                      In our case we didn’t have to learn almost nothing; in TYPO3 this couldn’t have been true I think.

                      cheers,

                      Roberto