We launched new forums in March 2019—join us there. In a hurry for help with your website? Get Help Now!
    • 6726
    • 7,075 Posts
    I think there is a namespaced version of mootools to avoid $ conflicts, but I don’t recall where it can be found (I confess I don’t use Mootools anymore but jQuery...).
      .: COO - Commerce Guys - Community Driven Innovation :.


      MODx est l'outil id
      • 25663 MODX Staff
      • 12,272 Posts
      Mootools won’t be doing namespacing anytime soon.
        Ryan Thrash, MODX Co-Founder
        Follow me on Twitter at @rthrash or catch my occasional unofficial thoughts at thrash.me
        • 6726
        • 7,075 Posts
        I seem to remember you mentionned a namespaced version (ah, it’s here, my memory is still good), but apparently never made it into the official distribution (why oh why is that ? jQuery does it so easily !).
          .: COO - Commerce Guys - Community Driven Innovation :.


          MODx est l'outil id
          • 25663 MODX Staff
          • 12,272 Posts
          Mootools and jQuery are pretty much polar opposites when it comes to their aims and goals. jQuery is shooting to be the every-man’s JS lib, whereas Mootools is looking to be the developer’s extendable library of choice. That’s my take anyway and I certainly don’t speak for the respective camps on either side.
            Ryan Thrash, MODX Co-Founder
            Follow me on Twitter at @rthrash or catch my occasional unofficial thoughts at thrash.me
            • 36416
            • 589 Posts
            Quote from: thehen at Mar 25, 2008, 08:31 AM

            In the end it seemed to be a conflict between ’Slimbox’ and ’SWFObject’.
            I decided to change the Maxigallery call to use ’&embedtype=`lightboxv2`’ and everything works okay.

            You can still try with SWFobject 2.0 / static publishing method:
            http://code.google.com/p/swfobject/wiki/SWFObject_2_0_documentation