Is this SEO proof?
I would like to have my homepage not as www.sitename.com but always like www.sitename.com/rotterdam-development.html
At the moment google says, hey thats duplicate content!
or should I better use a canonical link?
Did anyone used that already?
Evolution user, I like the back-end speed and simplicity

Would this do it when I set this on the homepage?
<link rel="canonical" href="http://www.sitename.com/rotterdam-development.html">
<link rel="canonical" href="[(site_url)][~1~]">
Evolution user, I like the back-end speed and simplicity

Hiya,
Not sure tbh, i use that solely for rewriting urls from one to another
ive never had the homepage as anything other than www.sitename.com
when you add an alias to your homepage like home or whatever then: site.com/ is the same page as site.com/home
google see it as duplicate content as what I think is whats happening.
but actually this is a other subject. your 301 redirect works.
Evolution user, I like the back-end speed and simplicity

@fourroses666
1) www.sitename.com it would be better for seo
2) but if you prefer sitename.com/rotterdam-development.html - yes, canonical url will solve google webmaster tool duplicate content
@canman
Try Virtual Alias or NGRedirect plugin instead .htacess redirect
http://www.stanback.net/code/modx/virtual-aliases.html
http://modx.com/extras/package/ngredirect
@banzai, Why would with-out be better? I think adding an url to the home will be better for seo, but maybe it doesn't matter that much. The only thing I don't like about it is that it doesn't look that nice.
@iusemodx, I know about the site start offcourse, but when linking in a resourse to the homepage the "full" url pops up. So if I'm right you always need to add the canonical link to correct this for Google (duplicate content). I think your call is correct, thanks!
Evolution user, I like the back-end speed and simplicity
