-
- 1,613 Posts
Is this SEO proof?
I would like to have my homepage not as www.sitename.com but always like www.sitename.com/rotterdam-development.html
At the moment google says, hey thats duplicate content!
or should I better use a canonical link?
Did anyone used that already?
Evolution user, I like the back-end speed and simplicity
-
- 1,613 Posts
Would this do it when I set this on the homepage?
<link rel="canonical" href="http://www.sitename.com/rotterdam-development.html">
<link rel="canonical" href="[(site_url)][~1~]">
Evolution user, I like the back-end speed and simplicity
-
- 463 Posts
Hiya,
Not sure tbh, i use that solely for rewriting urls from one to another
ive never had the homepage as anything other than www.sitename.com
-
- 1,613 Posts
when you add an alias to your homepage like home or whatever then: site.com/ is the same page as site.com/home
google see it as duplicate content as what I think is whats happening.
but actually this is a other subject. your 301 redirect works.
Evolution user, I like the back-end speed and simplicity
-
- 1,198 Posts
@fourroses666
1) www.sitename.com it would be better for seo
2) but if you prefer sitename.com/rotterdam-development.html - yes, canonical url will solve google webmaster tool duplicate content
@canman
Try Virtual Alias or NGRedirect plugin instead .htacess redirect
http://www.stanback.net/code/modx/virtual-aliases.html
http://modx.com/extras/package/ngredirect
-
- 1,613 Posts
@banzai, Why would with-out be better? I think adding an url to the home will be better for seo, but maybe it doesn't matter that much. The only thing I don't like about it is that it doesn't look that nice.
@iusemodx, I know about the site start offcourse, but when linking in a resourse to the homepage the "full" url pops up. So if I'm right you always need to add the canonical link to correct this for Google (duplicate content). I think your call is correct, thanks!
Evolution user, I like the back-end speed and simplicity