-
- 372 Posts
Does anyone know of RTE that supports "invisible elements" like Dreamweaver? It would be great to be able to extend it to support Snippets, Chunks, TVs, and Placeholders. It would be helpful to let editors know that they should not be editing snippets inside the content area.
DropboxUploader -- Upload files to a Dropbox account.
DIG -- Dynamic Image Generator
gus -- Google URL Shortener
makeQR -- Uses google chart api to make QR codes.
MODxTweeter -- Update your twitter status on publish.
-
- 712 Posts
Hiding elements seems counter to "What-You-See-Is-What-You-Get"
jpdevries
Indeed, hiding elements is a good way to have editors accidenally delete the whole bit where the element tags are supposed to be. What is needed is for a modified RTE that absolutely ignores MODx tags - no messing around with the & in them, no "forced root block" enclosing them in p (or whatever) tags.
-
- 372 Posts
Quote from: dinocorn at Aug 18, 2013, 05:32 AMHiding elements seems counter to "What-You-See-Is-What-You-Get"
No, in fact I mean the opposite. I suggest we create visual symbols to represent tags in the editor, perhaps lock them based on permissions. I would like to prevent editors from accidentally altering them, or give them a better understanding of the options available.
OOPS, I just realized I mocked up the symbols within code editor and not the WYSIWYG editor! Imagine it in the one of your choice.
[ed. note: bwente last edited this post 10 years, 8 months ago.]
DropboxUploader -- Upload files to a Dropbox account.
DIG -- Dynamic Image Generator
gus -- Google URL Shortener
makeQR -- Uses google chart api to make QR codes.
MODxTweeter -- Update your twitter status on publish.