Hello,
It seems like I’m missing something here. I thought that I could use the [tt]@CHUNK chunkname[/tt] binding to have the output of a chunk serve as input for a template variable. For example having a chunk called [tt]"fo[/tt] that called a snippet that returned the string [tt]"baz||fnord"[/tt] serve as input for the template variable [tt]bar[/tt]. Turns out that it doesn’t work that way. The template variable gets the content, not its (processed) output, of the chunk as input.
So, obviously I’m doing this the wrong way. What is the right way to do it?
