We launched new forums in March 2019—join us there. In a hurry for help with your website? Get Help Now!
    • 29540
    • 58 Posts
    Hello all,

    I'm planning to build a wedding site, but have no clue if its possible with Modx, preferably Evo.

    Requirements:
    - homepage public, the rest password protected
    - just 1 userid/password for everone
    - photogallery with about 3gb of photos
    - thumbnail, pop up image and link to download original photo


    - Is anonymous login possible with Weblogin?
    - Can Evo handle a gallery with 3gb of photos?
    - Can MaxiGallery do the job including a link to downoad original photo of each thumbail?

    Any ideas how to set this up?
      • 1343 ☆ A M B ☆
      • 2,213 Posts
      The short answer, yes. The entire site is possible with MODX Evolution or Revolution.

      - In regards to your specific questions, you can't do anonymous login that I am aware. It's either password protected or not, unless you are just restricting specific aspects (say downloading the original photo), which is another matter.

      - The better question is can your server handle 3GB of photos? Evo is limited by your server typically.

      - I wouldn't use MaxiGallery as it's a bit dated. I would use Easy 2 Gallery instead. Providing a direct link to the original photo should be very possible as well.

      I hope that helps.
        Patrick | Server Wrangler
        About Me: Website | Tweets |  MODX Hosting
        • 30023
        • 172 Posts
        How big the photos are is unlikely to be relevant - technically speaking the photos themselves are not going to be within the database, its their URLs/filepaths that are stored.

        I wouldn't be put off using Maxigallery if it does all that you want.

        -- Tim.
          • 29540
          • 58 Posts
          Thanks for now.

          So i will use Evo as my account has 7,5GB space and 100GB traffice.

          Probably will use MaxiGallery anyway.

          And for security will use .htaccess for entire site. Are multiple logins at the same time possible then?
            • 1343 ☆ A M B ☆
            • 2,213 Posts
            I would recommend weblogin over htaccess, as you have better control over the security, but either will work and support multiple users. The .htaccess method, you must add every user manually.
              Patrick | Server Wrangler
              About Me: Website | Tweets |  MODX Hosting
              • 29540
              • 58 Posts
              Guess i wasn't clear. I meant i want just one userid, which will be used by more than one people, will more than one people be able to login using this single id at the same time?

              I understood this is not possible with weblogin, but what about just .htaccess?
                • 10208 ☆ A M B ☆
                • 1,780 Posts
                If you went with Revo, you could use PageLocker and just password the resources, no?

                http://modx.com/extras/package/pagelocker

                edit: I see a resource group is required. Will users not want to go through the registration process to gain access?
                [ed. note: frogabog last edited this post 13 years, 11 months ago.]
                  Frogabog- MODX Websites in Portland Oregon
                  "Do yourself a favor and get a copy of "MODX - The Official Guide" by Bob Ray. Read it.
                  Having server issues? These guys have MODX Hosting perfected - SkyToaster
                  • 30023
                  • 172 Posts
                  Quote from: tessed at Oct 16, 2012, 01:29 PM
                  Guess i wasn't clear. I meant i want just one userid, which will be used by more than one people, will more than one people be able to login using this single id at the same time?

                  I understood this is not possible with weblogin, but what about just .htaccess?

                  Either WebLogin, WebLoginPE or .htaccess password-protection will allow multiple users to log in at the same time using the same username/password combination.

                  This is 'security-lite' though. Ideal if you'd merely rather not have every Tom, D_ick (*) and Harry looking, but not ideal if you need privacy.

                  -- Tim.

                  PS On a side note, without the underscore Discuss filters out this name! http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tom,_Dick_and_Harry