RE:scriptaculous-Hidden Div and QuickEdit-

Finally working on my first modx site again...anyrate.

I cant edit from the front end on a particular page because Im using some trix!

heres the trick:
Ive made a DL
in the DT I have an image for the "onclick=Effect.Appear" scriptaculous effect event
So the DD opens.

Its great. I love it tooke me forever to get working right.

One problem though , the front end editor. When I click on that page..it only shows me the DT not the DD, which is what may need to be edited and updated from time to time.


I realize of course this has to do with the show hide nature of the script..(and style:display:none)
Anyone have suggestions getting the frontend editor..to read into the DD’s?

Thanks for any suggestions

(this refers to quickEdit of course)


UPDATE:
I just tried custom link as well
<quickedit:content /> placed in a DD...
and it shows up in the dd during browsing but when you click to edit..it only shows the DT to edit.

The DD Does have a style display: none;
to it, its the nature of the script...to work in that method...
(show and hide)
So I know thats the issue..but I cant figure out what to do about it...LOL.
Should I try making a TV?

Ok been a few hours trying stuff out...this is definately an issue with the inline style (*necessary for the script to work) of Display:none.
So I guess my questions is...
How can I call quickedit so that the previously hidden element (in this case definition -DD) is editable?

Otherwise I have no other recourse but to abandon that idea I guess.

You see its a group bios page..and basically what I have is an accordian type of effect , to save space...
BUT if people (other than myself) can’t easily edit their own bios..

Well it defeats the whole purpose of me transfering our site to modx, ( of course I still paln on using it though, just may have to drop this idea)

Hi thought Id rename the title of this post to be more specific.
Does anyone have a suggestions for this?
-ty

Just take 0.96RC3, its Quickedit functions are moved to mootools. Perhaps there is no conflict anymore.

oh wow..im an idiot I didnt even think about the version(s)
I was testing it on my local version...I went and tested on my remote which is a more recent version.
..no problem!

local 9.21
remote tester-9.5 (and it wrx fine here-dont know if its moo related, but something fixed)

I guess I didnt even think about what ver I had installed remotely..it was supposed to save time to develop locally. LOL

Note to self: why the hell am i developing on two diff versions! LOL

Thanks for the heads up!