We launched new forums in March 2019—join us there. In a hurry for help with your website? Get Help Now!
    • 13137
    • 204 Posts
    I have a gallery ( http://arteneis.com/index.php?id=42&page=3 ) that uses the following call:
    [!MaxiGallery? &display=`embedded` &embedtype=`lightboxv2` &pics_per_row=`4` &max_thumb_size=`170` &max_pic_size=`780x500` &pics_per_page=`20` lang=`es`!] 


    But the latest images that have been added are coming with a dimension of 377x450 and thumbnails of 130.
    In the link above you can see that the two first images are smaller.

    I double checked to see if the call had been modified, but nothing has changed. huh
    Anyone know why this would be happening?
      • 13137
      • 204 Posts
      After further investigation, I have found that this is only happening when "mg_backend_manager" is used.

      If I upload via the front end, everything re-sizes as expected.

      Any ideas why this would be happening?
        • 7923
        • 4,213 Posts
        you must use the same (picture/thumbsize) parameters in the document that mg_backend_manager uses.


          "He can have a lollipop any time he wants to. That's what it means to be a programmer."
          • 13137
          • 204 Posts
          Where do you define picture/thumbsize in mg_backend_manager?

          I thought that it would be using the gallery call, like in the front end.

          And if it is only using the defaults from maxigallery.php, there is only one number for both height and width (650px) as opposed to a call where you can use 800x600.

          Or is this just a short coming of the backend?
            • 7923
            • 4,213 Posts
            When you setup the mg backend manager, you need to create a document at one step what the backend manager uses. That document must have same parameters as the gallery.


              "He can have a lollipop any time he wants to. That's what it means to be a programmer."