-
- 956 Posts
SMF is XHTML transitional compliant. Are you sure you absolutely need XHTML strict?
-
- 59 Posts
I’d really prefer it. I’m not quite sure why people are using XHTML transitional at all since -- as far as I understand it -- the main difference is tags that no web developer with pride has used since the dawn of CSS.
XHTML transitional is XHTML.
Ryan Thrash, MODX Co-Founder
Follow me on Twitter at @rthrash or catch my occasional unofficial thoughts at thrash.me
-
- 24,544 Posts
Quote from: rthrash at Feb 18, 2009, 09:01 PM
XHTML transitional is XHTML.
And I think IE7, in addition to IE6, treats both strict and transitional as HTML so for a huge chunk of users, you’re still using HTML.
I try not to lose any sleep over
doctypes as long as the pages look good in almost all browsers.
-
- 1,131 Posts
The main reason to avoid XHTML transitional is that it allows for behavioral attributes that have been deprecated from the strict doctype. If you build a site using a transitional doctype and later decide to update it and change it to a strict doctype then you’ll have to remove any links with a "target" attribute and other things like that. Better to stick with a strict doctype to ensure that your code is adhering to standards of markup as much as possible. Plus, it’ll help you alleviate some bad habits.
Jeff Whitfield
"I like my coffee hot and strong, like I like my women, hot and strong... with a spoon in them."