Quote from: French at Apr 08, 2006, 06:58 AMThey are more interested in super dupper uber geeky users than average joes.
Like Ryan said, it’s not a question of interrest.
And as I have said elsewhere, it’s not a lack of interrest towards the end user as sytems user and content editors (QuickEdit alone disproves this theory

).
It’s just that MODx might not be for the end user who want to use it to build websites. There is a big difference.
So yes, it’s aimed at pros and geeky users right now. And rightly so ! Do you enjoy MODx templating ? Template Variables ? Widgets ? Well all this wouldn’t exist if the end user had been in the mind of the dev team to begin with. The tool was first and foremost built for pros who wanted better control and flexiblility to build dynamic websites. Pure and simple : it explains why so many pros are simply LOVING MODx : it helps them built websites faster, better than with other tools...
We all dreamed of a tool working our way and not agains us !!!
Anyway, many OS project have made the mistake to divert ressources from development, or try to satisfy then end user with loads of features built-in and one-click-install systems which in the end makes the application a pain to work with : rigid template system, lots of hardcoded things that go against the presentation/content separation, etc...
The only two that did not go that way are Textpattern and MODx.
Quote from: FrenchMODx is their baby and they can do what the f*ck they want with it, but it does not stop me to think they are dead wrong on this specific subject, and it still pisses me off as I really like this CMS as a CMS.
Everyone is entitled to an opinion
I think you wouldn’t like MODx so much if it went the road you describe here...
Quote from: FrenchNot a techno tool to please coders.
I don’t agree at all on this, I am no coder, and most of the pros who like MODx right now are... webdesigners !