We launched new forums in March 2019—join us there. In a hurry for help with your website? Get Help Now!
    • 28373
    • 204 Posts
    You’ve all done a great job, and a favor to the css design community. I’ll write what I have to as I’m sure I’ll be needing it anyway, it’ll be interesting to see whatever organizational plans you have come to fruitition - I understand the hurdles it’s not a commercial application where timelines and controls can be used to manage the flow of information, then you wake up one day and tiger you had by the tail has taken on a life of its own . . . and like all parent’s, it’s wanting that their children follow in their footsteps but that such expectations are usually a stairway to disappointment *lol* just look at mambo grin
      • 4273
      • 356 Posts
      Group Hug laugh
        SMF Bookmark Mod - check it out
        http://mods.simplemachines.org/index.php?mod=350
        • 16879
        • 87 Posts
        I’ve just found Modx after searching for a CMS/F that would address the design flexibility limitations imposed by the hard coded table layouts in Joomla . From a design and development perspective I can see the immense potential of Modx over Joomla but I’m a little concerned by the content editor and it’s usability for novice content editors - looks like hard work!. I am however going to suck it and see and hopefully stick with it - I think putting some effort into training content editors will probably be needed for these early versions. I will be watching Modx develop keenly from now on...
          • 6726
          • 7,075 Posts
          Quote from: Leezig at Mar 18, 2006, 03:16 AM
          (...) but I’m a little concerned by the content editor and it’s usability for novice content editors - looks like hard work!. I am however going to suck it and see and hopefully stick with it - I think putting some effort into training content editors will probably be needed for these early versions. I will be watching Modx develop keenly from now on...

          Hmmm, I am not sure what you mean by "content editors" :


          Anyway, this should not be a concern... and MODx is already as good as any CMS in this area maybe even among the best if you consider you can not only use WYSIWYG but also syntax like BBCode, Textile and Markdown to format the content grin

          As for novices, things will get even better in the future with expanding quickedit features : they won’t even need to log into the manager not only to edit but also create/manage pages via quickedit (frontend editing module) laugh
            .: COO - Commerce Guys - Community Driven Innovation :.


            MODx est l'outil id
            • 16879
            • 87 Posts
            What I was meaning by "content editors" was users who would only have permission to edit content as opposed to myself as a site developer/designer. As I said, I have only just found Modx and I posted after an intial quick look at the system. As I explore it more I can see that it probably be relatively easy to do the things I want and let non-developers edit content. The "quick-edit" feature looks promising. Don’t get me wrong here, I really want to use this system - it’s the only CMS I’ve seen that will give me total freedom to implement tableless designs and the power and potential to create great usable sites...
              • 15826
              • 160 Posts
              Okay, time for my two cents as a FRONT end dev.

              I absolutely love the Joomla community and the extensibility of Joomla, and it is a bit easier out of the box for a user. BUT--

              The core code of Joomla dictates to me, the front end dev, what HTML I have to use unless I want to hack core to make it work differently (not good at upgrade time, oh no! Not to mention that we’re talking about a great NUMBER of core files that would need to be hacked.)

              It is IMPOSSIBLE to build an accessible website in Joomla. It is also IMPOSSIBLE to build a tableless website in Joomla.

              MANY of the plugs/mods/mambots which, from one point of view are Joomla’s strength, generate TAG SOUP on the front end, causing huge headaches and angina to the front end dev- me. I find this to be a huge weakness since I have better things to do than hack around trying to get broken code to look good in all browsers (especially IE.)

              The editors which are easily integrated into Joomla are also guilty of sometimes (often) generating non valid front end code, also adding to the above mentioned headaches.


              Now, ModX--

              On the downside- it’s a young application that’s not yet very extensible, though I’ve seen great improvement on this front since it’s been released.

              It can be a steep learning curve for a strictly front end dev (I am so php challenged it is NOT funny.) However, if set up right, this can be a VERY easy application for the user despite what others have said. I’ve succeeded in doing that for a client, though my hair went half gray in the process . . . wink

              On the UP side-

              ModX NEVER dictates to me what html it will generate. I have complete control over the frontend. I can make my layouts SING in this web ap! And with minimal hacking to get things working cross browser since I am the one dictating the frontend code instead of the web ap doing so. Not so in Joomla.

              The community here, though smaller, is EVERY BIT AS KICKASS as the Joomla community. Even better is the commitment here that I see to write an application that is totally capable of w3 and wai compliance. Actually, it’s already been written. Compliant websites are already possible with ModX (and have been from the beginning, I think) whereas mambo, and then Joomla have been talking about the "coming release" of their accessible version for well over a year now, with no release date in sight.

              That commitment to coding excellence and forethought to the future extends into the extensions/plugins/mods/snippets/chunks made available through the community to extend ModX. Though I do admit that my use of ModX has been limited and there may be more, I personally have only found ONE snippet that generated non validating code (minor and I was able to fix despite being all thumbs with php) and I think I may have grabbed that one off the etomite site smiley

              The forum integration and other integrations, mods and extensions can’t come soon enough for me. I really don’t want to have to template to Joomla or the others since it’s so much eaiser for me to work with ModX. The couple clients I’ve had who are using it agree. It took them a bit of learning to use the admin interface to create documents, but I had them up and running editing their initially created docs within about five minutes with quickedit. They were tickled and so was I. Even better, with some wanking on the editor, it’s generating (mostly) compliant code and what noncompliant code is created has been put there by the client, so there have not been any whining from them about broken pages or stuff flying every which way in the layout. That makes me a VERY happy camper!

              I’m still wondering why people say ModX is hard to use -- I STILL, AFTER HOURS AND HOURS CAN’T USE CIVICSPACE/DRUPAL. I can skin it- I just can’t use the SOB. And though ModX is a bit challenging for ME to set up, my clients, who, though reasonably intelligent are ’puter challenged, are loving this ap.

              Hope that helps.
                "I’d love to change the world but I can’t find the source code . . ."

                Custom ModX Templates
                • 22303 MODX Staff
                • 10,725 Posts
                Quote from: kickass at Mar 18, 2006, 09:51 AM

                That commitment to coding excellence and forethought to the future extends into the extensions/plugins/mods/snippets/chunks made available through the community to extend ModX. Though I do admit that my use of ModX has been limited and there may be more, I personally have only found ONE snippet that generated non validating code (minor and I was able to fix despite being all thumbs with php) and I think I may have grabbed that one off the etomite site smiley

                The forum integration and other integrations, mods and extensions can’t come soon enough for me.

                Great feedback kickass! And I couldn’t agree more, especially in the integrations/extensions department.

                One thing I’ve been noticing more lately is we are attracting a large number of designer-level users because of the MODx freedom in generating markup, but we are not seeing as big of a response from the developer community. I believe this is due to a weak, and unorganized API, inherited from Etomite. But rest assured, that one of the top-priority goals at this moment (in fact, I’m coding it now, if I’d stop replying to forum posts... laugh), is to remedy that so we can start attracting more early-adopters from the PHP dev world, and start producing a greater quantity of end-user quality components with the same freedom MODx designers love, and the ease-of-use many have come to expect in the open-source YAPS (Yet Another Portal System) market.
                  • 32241
                  • 1,495 Posts
                  Quote from: OpenGeek at Mar 18, 2006, 12:41 PM
                  I believe this is due to a weak, and unorganized API, inherited from Etomite. But rest assured, that one of the top-priority goals at this moment (in fact, I’m coding it now, if I’d stop replying to forum posts... laugh)

                  Keep coding then Jason tongue Heheheee....

                  Btw, I’m of those developer who got attracted by the MODx system though. So far we do have a great framework system, except for the fact that it’s still not as developer friendly, compare to designer friendly. grin
                    Wendy Novianto
                    [font=Verdana]PT DJAMOER Technology Media
                    [font=Verdana]Xituz Media
                    • 15826
                    • 160 Posts
                    Well, from the upbeat and can-do attitude I’ve seen around here, not to mention the raw and awesome talent, I am confident you folks can do whatever needs to be done. Just forgive me for wanting it all yesterday, this ap is SO overdue on the dev scene it’s unbelievable! The hole you are slowly but surely filling is a gaping one, and by you filling it we’ll all do well by it.

                    Oh, and as to the front end dev community seeing the light . . . it could be because I’ve been shouting it from the rooftops every chance I get (and I think you folks have figured out by now that I’m not the shy kind smiley) Just do a search on css-d maillist, or evolt or webdesign-l, or on some of the messageboards such as webproworld and you’ll find modx mentioned by yours truly every time a front ender was bemoaning the lack of an xhtml/css friendly CMS. Maybe you back enders need to get just as vocal in your venues. Sig files on forums can also be a good thing, get some MORE googly goodness going here.
                      "I’d love to change the world but I can’t find the source code . . ."

                      Custom ModX Templates
                      • 28373
                      • 204 Posts
                      Quote from: OpenGeek at Mar 18, 2006, 12:41 PM

                      the ease-of-use many have come to expect in the open-source YAPS (Yet Another Portal System) market.

                      It’s that ease-of-use which has been designers and standards compliant coders biggest problem. modX solved that problem, what more could you want ?

                      The problem with promoting modX kickass - is that it sounds too good to be true, how fu#ked up is that!

                      All you need is csszengarden powered by modX - that’s the key!