Support/Comments for getResources 1.1.0-pl

This is an auto-generated topic for getResources 1.1.0-pl by opengeek.

Brief Description:


getResources 1.1.0-pl (July 30, 2010)

• - Added &toPlaceholder property for assigning results to a placeholder
• - Added &resources property for including/excluding specific resources
• - Added &showDeleted property
• - Allow multiple contexts to be passed into &context
• - Added &showUnpublish property
• - Added getresources.core_path reference for easier development
• - [[#ADDON-135]] Make output separator configurable via outputSeparator property
• - Add where property to allow ad hoc criteria in JSON format

Hello

I use MODx Revolution 2.0.0 and getResources 1.1.0-pl
There is a folder called "banners" of its id = 18, there are pictures of banners.
There is a snippet that displays all of these banners
[tt][[getResources? &parents=`18` &includeContent=`1` &tpl=`BANNER-tpl`]][/tt]

But the problem is displayed on the page defined banner.
Created for this TV (listbox multi-select), entitled "Banner" which selects a list of all banners:
[tt]@SELECT GROUP_CONCAT(CONCAT(pagetitle, ’==’, id) SEPARATOR ’||’) FROM modx_site_content WHERE parent = 18[/tt]
It turns out the construction of the form: banner1==id||banner2==id

And then in the settings of each page, I choose which banner to show.
But how to remake getResources that he understood this filter, I do not understand, tell me please.

In my understanding must be that something like this:
[tt][[getResources? &parents=`18` &includeContent=`1` &tvFilters=`Banner` &tpl=`BANNER-tpl`]][/tt]
Tried and there are options:
[tt][[getResources? &parents=`18` &includeContent=`1` &tvFilters=`Banner==%` &tpl=`BANNER-tpl`]][/tt]
[tt][[getResources? &parents=`18` &includeContent=`1` &tvFilters=`Banner==%` &tpl=`BANNER-tpl` &includeTVs=`1`]][/tt]
[tt][[getResources? &parents=`18` &includeContent=`1` &tvFilters=`Banner==%` &tpl=`BANNER-tpl` &includeTVs=`1` &processTVs=`1`]][/tt]

What is in your BANNER-tpl? The last one with &processTVs=`1` should work for you.

Hi Jason,

is it a expected behaviour that TVs in the content field are not being parsed?



Chunk gR_tpl:



Sample Content:


With "myTV"as a simple text TV. Result is that the TV in the content field doesn`t appear. Tried it with chunks and a simple snippet, all of which get rendered.

Next question:

According to the documentation a filter like



should only display resources with the TV "kategorie" set to kategorie2 OR kategorie3. But gR shows ALL resources. If I reduce it to



gR displays only resources with the TV set to kategorie2, as expected.

Quote from: MadeMyDay at Aug 03, 2010, 02:20 PM

is it a expected behaviour that TVs in the content field are not being parsed?

If it appears in the content as a TV tag, then it would be parsed as if it were on the Resource with the getResources call rather than on the original Resource.

Also BTW, &processTVs=`1` vs. &processTV=`1`

Quote from: MadeMyDay at Aug 04, 2010, 09:26 AM

According to the documentation a filter like

&tvFilters=`kategorie==kategorie2||kategorie==kategorie3`

should only display resources with the TV "kategorie" set to kategorie2 OR kategorie3. But gR shows ALL resources. If I reduce it to

&tvFilters=`kategorie==kategorie2`

gR displays only resources with the TV set to kategorie2, as expected.

Perhaps file a bug at http://github.com/opengeek/getResources/issues; it should work as an OR like that AFAIK.

Hi,

for me, the &resources parameter does not WAD.

documentstructure is
id25 (resource as container)
-id26 (resource)
-id27 (resource)

snippet call:


but what is being output is resource id26 and id27...

I then checked the snippet code and found around line 148:



which i changed to



(short: changed "orCondition" to "andCondition")

now it works as I would intend it to WAD.
But I would like to avoid hacking snippets from package management, since they may get overwritten with future updates.

Is this a bug, or is it me doing something not in the correct way?

Thanks
Alex

PS: I dont have a github account, otherwise i would have filed a bugreport there. (if i could be sure it is a bug anyway, hehe)

I can’t tell what you intended by turning this into an AND condition. It was intended to work as an OR condition though.

my intention is, when using getResources &resource=`27` to output ONLY resource 27, and not 26 AND 27.
(given the example in my last posting)

do i use the parameter wrong?

rgds
Alex