Have you included <base href="[[++site_url]]" /> in your site <head> section?
Thanks that did the trick
[tt]<base href="[[!++site_url]]" />[/tt] is better (note the exclamation mark), and prevents problems when the scheme changes, such as going from http to https.
lo9on.com
MODx Evolution/Revolution | Remote Desktop Training | Development
But if your site is on http: only how is it better? Just wondering...
If your visitor won’t be jumping from subdomain to subdomain, or SSL to non-SSL, then [tt]<base href="[[++site_url]]" />[/tt] is fine, and may give you a micro-fractional performance improvement since the tag is cached and doesn’t change (until you clear your cache).
IMHO if you are a developer/designer, I feel though it is good practice to always call that tag as uncached (with the exclamation mark). That will certainly prevent problems and headaches if one of your sites ever does have a change in subdomain or scheme.
lo9on.com
MODx Evolution/Revolution | Remote Desktop Training | Development
Fair enough - I haven’t built a cross-scheme site yet with modx but I will certainly keep that in mind. Cheers for the explanation!