Quote from: jrotering at Jun 07, 2010, 09:58 AM
If you have any thoughts on how this could be improved (other than by better documenting the above points), I’d love to hear them.
- At the moment an access policy is about to be created, test to see if the user doing the creating will be affected by the policy and warn them ["You will lose access to X unless you either A) first create an ACL for X for your user group, or B) add yourself to the current user group. -cancel- or -proceed-]
I think this is a really great idea.
It would probably make your other suggestion unnecessary.
Could you file it using the Jira bugs and requests link at the top of this page so it won’t get lost in the shuffle?
(Feel free to file the other one too if you still think it’s necessary.)
Shows how much I know -- I figured that would be the easy one.
I was thinking that you'd check the current user's access to the resource group or category, set the new rule, check the access to the resource group or category again, and issue the warning if there's a change and access will be lost.
[ed. note: BobRay last edited this post 12 years, 3 months ago.]
-
☆ A M B ☆
- 450 Posts
Maybe initially you could just throw a generic warning that doesn’t do any actual checking, just describes what might happen if the proper care isn’t taken. That would have been enough to probably save me from shooting myself in the foot.
Great to hear about the user group and category inheritance stuff that is coming. I’m sure I’ll be using those features.
This saved me. Bookmarked too