Ditto on revolution: how to order records

FYI, &orderBy is not a valid property for getResources.

Quote from: OpenGeek at Feb 19, 2010, 08:58 AM

FYI, &orderBy is not a valid property for getResources.

This is what I’ve do

[[!getResources? &parents=`12` &sortBy=`id` &sortDir=`ASC` ]]

[[!getResources? &parents=`12` &tpl=`tplResourcesNews`]]


with "tplResourcesNews":

<h3><a href="[[~[[+id]]]]" title="[[+pagetitle]]">[[+pagetitle]]</a></h3>
<p>[[+introtext]]</p>
<p>[[+content:limit=`50`]]</p>
<a href="[[~[[+id]]]]" title="[[+pagetitle]]">Continue...</a>







I show an empty page!

Quote from: OpenGeek at Feb 19, 2010, 08:58 AM

FYI, &orderBy is not a valid property for getResources.

Oops, it appeared to work but you’re right. My bad.

Quote from: sarah_77 at Feb 19, 2010, 09:12 AM

Quote from: OpenGeek at Feb 19, 2010, 08:58 AM

FYI, &orderBy is not a valid property for getResources.

This is what I’ve do

[[!getResources? &parents=`12` &sortBy=`id` &sortDir=`ASC` ]]

[[!getResources? &parents=`12` &tpl=`tplResourcesNews`]]


with "tplResourcesNews":

<h3><a href="[[~[[+id]]]]" title="[[+pagetitle]]">[[+pagetitle]]</a></h3>
<p>[[+introtext]]</p>
<p>[[+content:limit=`50`]]</p>
<a href="[[~[[+id]]]]" title="[[+pagetitle]]">Continue...</a>







I show an empty page!

I don’t know what to tell you. Those both work fine for me with your Tpl chunk.

Is document 12 a published container with published children?

Try &parents=`0`

with &parents=`0` I show only 3 items of all elements that I’ve in my tree!!

I’ve seen in DB table site_content and all records has date fields filled!

I don’t know the problem

By default, it only shows published documents that don’t have "hide from menus" set. It also won’t show children of unpublished docs.

My items has "hide from menus" checked

Greeeeeeeeeat!!! It works!!!

do you think that it’s better to use ditto or getresources?

Thanks

Quote from: sarah_77 at Feb 20, 2010, 05:31 AM

Greeeeeeeeeat!!! It works!!!

do you think that it’s better to use ditto or getresources?

Thanks

If getResources will do what you want, it’s definitely better.