Thanks for the comments. Surprised me to see Netbeans mentioned repeatedly. Even Notepad++. Hmmm, interesting.
As your responses infer, tool-selection seems to be influenced by the scope of the job-at-hand. Bigger jobs need more powerful tools.
One of the more-common comments regarding ’features’ you hear about MODx (if not *the* most common comment) is its ’flexibility’. So I’d expect folks who are drawn to MODx to be those who enjoy tinkering and tweaking .. no?
Am I wrong to assume that REVO is coded with flexibility in mind?
What about something like Komodo Edit?
http://www.activestate.com/komodo_edit/
Nobody using that freebie? (It’s not just for PHP, tho.)
But MODx has its own framework, yes? Just like EE has CodeIgniter:
http://expressionengine.com/public_beta/
btw .. have you noticed the similarities between EE 2.0 and MODx 2.0? Both are "v2.0" complete rewrites of popular PHP-based CMS’es .. sporting their own frameworks.
But EE is not open source and I believe they decided to maintain compatibility with PHP4.
Where can I learn more about the MODx framework?
Lastly, this link seems relevant:
http://blogs.gartner.com/mark_driver/2009/12/03/php-past-present-and-future/
.. where it says:
•Consider adopting and customizing industry-proven Web solutions (e.g., Drupal, MediaWiki, etc.) built on PHP before building solutions from scratch.