Fair enough. I’m not familiar with Eto version numbers, but if I ever have anything installed with a version number that starts "0", I don’t expect support forever.
But yes, having now found the thread (which seems shorter than it might have once been), I see where you’re coming from.
In some ways Eto seem worse than Microsoft. At least by the time Microsoft pull the plug on support, the new version has had at least one Service Pack release to mop up the early bugs. I see from the very next post that Eto are effectively encouraging users to upgrade to a buggy version *knowing that SP1 is around the corner!*.
A fully patched version of the Etomite Prelude Final release will be available sometime in August... Anyone who will be upgrading may want to wait for the fully patched release... We will make an announcement when it is available...
Now THAT’s hilarious. To summarise the thread, it seems to say: "You must upgrade to this crappy distro with lots of known bugs in it and poorly written instructions for a needlessly complicated upgrade. Or you could wait for a slightly less crappy one that still has issues - but they’re mostly with the new third-party things it foists on you rather than the core, so it’s not our fault (even though we selected them and put them in the distro). It’s up to you what you do, but do it ASAP."
Or "Stop asking questions about the previous versions and ask us why the new version doesn’t work instead".