We launched new forums in March 2019—join us there. In a hurry for help with your website? Get Help Now!
    • 18397
    • 3,250 Posts
    I now have the abillity to remove the tv prefix from Ditto and doing so would greatly increase performance as I could drop about 15% of the current codebase that was specific to getting TVs. But, it would break backwards compatibility. So, what are you thoughts?
      • 25663 MODX Staff
      • 12,272 Posts
      Drop it and advise them to upgrade with a new name like "DittoNew" and then modify the calls as needed.
        Ryan Thrash, MODX Co-Founder
        Follow me on Twitter at @rthrash or catch my occasional unofficial thoughts at thrash.me
        • 33337
        • 3,975 Posts
        And a detailed blog post about this transition would play a great role wink
          Zaigham R - MODX Professional | Skype | Email | Twitter

          Digging the interwebs for #MODX gems and bringing it to you. modx.link
          • 33337
          • 3,975 Posts
          and as I can see the major revision in the code, so I guess its going to be 1.1 ?
            Zaigham R - MODX Professional | Skype | Email | Twitter

            Digging the interwebs for #MODX gems and bringing it to you. modx.link
            • 18397
            • 3,250 Posts
            Sadly, it looks like this will not be happening for a while. The current MODx API is missing several critical functions to make this work, most of it dealing with how tvs are stored (in their raw, not processed form). This keeps me from using SQL to sort and filter tvs. As it has been said before, SQL sorting and filtering is far faster than PHP on large arrays... So, until then...