-
MODX Staff
- 10,725 Posts
Hmm, now I’m confused. I just reviewed the W3C specs, and then retried the base tag solution and it worked like a charm. If we don’t have to change anything by just simply using this tag in the templates (and perhaps offering a way to easily add this tag to templates from the manager?), then I vote for that solution. I’d rather not be changing URL’s since some may actually be required to be absolute from the webserver in content users author from the manager.
Quote from: OpenGeek at Jul 13, 2005, 02:39 PM
Hmm, now I’m confused.? I just reviewed the W3C specs, and then retried the base tag solution and it worked like a charm.? If we don’t have to change anything by just simply using this tag in the templates (and perhaps offering a way to easily add this tag to templates from the manager?), then I vote for that solution.? I’d rather not be changing URL’s since some may actually be required to be absolute from the webserver in content users author from the manager.
sounds great! So the W3c supports it? Does it work in IE, FF and Safari, etc?
It can be easily added to the out going html see documentparser class and look where I insert js, css and meta tags. You could add a check to see if friendly url alias paths are on and then insert the base tag
Give it a try and let me know if it works.
