Well I always thought so myself too, but lately I was improving a site and checked google insights and that was saying I need to put css below. I don't like that too much because it is loading all content first and after that loading the css style and that dont look that great when having slow internet.
http://developers.google.com/speed/pagespeed/insights
https://developers.google.com/speed/docs/insights/OptimizeCSSDelivery
I think when using it like this it is correct: (
property and rel)
<link type="text/css" rel="stylesheet" property="stylesheet" href="css/homepage.css" />
[ed. note: fourroses666 last edited this post 10 years, 4 months ago.]
Evolution user, I like the back-end speed and simplicity
oké thanks for the info. didn't understand the part to split them up in head and on the bottom.
Evolution user, I like the back-end speed and simplicity
I do see allot of front-end improvement when using it.
Using it on all new (EVO) websites. All I need to do is add /min/?f= and combine + seperate the paths with a ,
Its not that hard to do. I rather deside what files I compress and which I don't then having it done automaticly.
Evolution user, I like the back-end speed and simplicity
Ah I just realized that thread I provided was about including the minimizing functions *by default*, the argument was it doesn't make a huge difference and ends up causing problems for new or inexperienced users.
So, maybe not relevant after all, for you experienced users. Never mind :p