We launched new forums in March 2019—join us there. In a hurry for help with your website? Get Help Now!
    • 32942
    • 141 Posts
    I wished:

    All Xaraya features were in modx, but better organized, ajax enabled, accessible, clean, and in a very small package size.

    Not reclame, just a link.
    http://www.xaraya.com/

    Anyone downloading and installing it is wheter a really lavishly enterprises webmaster or just mad. Itz huuge
      • 6726
      • 7,075 Posts
      Yeah well, Xaraya is not news for those who use CMS/CMF. I am not sure big enterprises deploy Xaraya, but it’s a very ambitious project and you can build pretty complex websites with it, if you get past the learning curve. I have kept tabs on it because of the dynamic data stuff but expected some improvement in the UI departement which never came...

      Which features are not in MODx and are in Xaraya that you’d like to see in MODx ?
      Not sure that there are a lot of those or that they would be hard to implement...

      Dynamic Data ? MODx has TV and it goes beyond IMHO...
      XML-RPC ? Not yet in MODx yeah but it’s coming I think someone’s working on it. Same goes for LDAP authentification...

      As far as I am concerned, Xaraya has a pretty cluttered and poorly designed admin GUI, a bit like Drupal its logic is somewhat different from other CMS (so is MODx, but at least you get nice results fast tongue).
        .: COO - Commerce Guys - Community Driven Innovation :.


        MODx est l'outil id
        • 32942
        • 141 Posts
        true words,
        wise man.

        It has a poor backend.
          • 15826
          • 160 Posts
          Not to mention that, like Drupal, you have to swallow a Jargon Dictionary to be able to do the least little thing with it. Both these programs are easier to skin than to use, which is why I don’t recommend for clients (while I recommend ModX all the time smiley
            "I’d love to change the world but I can’t find the source code . . ."

            Custom ModX Templates
            • 16429
            • 254 Posts
            I’ve done a site with Xaraya, www.dallasimmobiliare.it. It took a month to me to learn and some things (like the contact form which is, in fact, the Xaraya registration) needed an excamotage because I can’t figure how to make it with that system.
            Maybe it has many chances but (I fully agree with kickass) it’s a pain to do very simple things.
            By the way, from Xaraya came my hate to conditional comments: your work ends up in a enormous template hard to mantain over time (without talking about leaving the work to others!) just to display a single page.
            Their Dynamic Data can be very interesting, but it’s pretty hard to take advantage of without a line of explanation and no community behind.
            Because there’s no community behind... void forums... no-one replies to emails... (well, this is just my experience with them)
            And after all the possibilities, passing the "vertical" learning curve, what you get? To be chained in "articles", "reviews" and similar kind of organization.
            Well, Postnuke can do the same and now with the last template engines can provide pretty xhtml output too, with about no learning difficulties and a wide range of addons.
            This leaving apart problems like the horror admin interface (and there is someone that talks bad of MODx admin interface? Have you ever used, or seen the Xaraya’s? I don’t think so) and the slowness.

            If the client of the above site asks for a change in the site, surely I’ll convert it in MODx to do the change.
              kudo
              www.kudolink.com - webdesign (surprised?)

              [img]http://www.kudolink.com/kudolinkcom.png[/img] [sup]proudly uses[/sup] [img]http://www.kudolink.com/modx.png[/img]
              • 7923
              • 4,213 Posts
              Quote from: kudolink at Jan 25, 2007, 12:31 PM

              I’ve done a site with Xaraya, www.dallasimmobiliare.it.
              I’m just seeing this from that url:

              Parse error: syntax error, unexpected ’<’ in /www/MW_qPPRanncq/dallasimmobiliare.it/index.php on line 180


                "He can have a lollipop any time he wants to. That's what it means to be a programmer."
                • 16429
                • 254 Posts
                It’s incredible. Something has truncated the index.php this morning.
                It’s pure luck we’ve speak about Xaraya just today!

                Thank you doze: I didn’t look at the site when I wrote the url.
                  kudo
                  www.kudolink.com - webdesign (surprised?)

                  [img]http://www.kudolink.com/kudolinkcom.png[/img] [sup]proudly uses[/sup] [img]http://www.kudolink.com/modx.png[/img]
                  • 22815
                  • 1,097 Posts
                  OK. But returning to the original post, what features *does* xaraya have that MODx does not?
                    No, I don&#39;t know what OpenGeek&#39;s saying half the time either.
                    MODx Documentation: The Wiki | My Wiki contributions | Main MODx Documentation
                    Forum: Where to post threads about add-ons | Forum Rules
                    Like MODx? donate (and/or share your resources)
                    Like me? See my Amazon wishlist
                    MODx "Most Promising CMS" - so appropriate!
                    • 32942
                    • 141 Posts
                    oh it seems, nothing is comparable to modx.
                    but there was always someone who did it’s job better,
                    until modx.
                    maybe any "enemy" is terminated in this case tongue

                    hey was it was a try to find any functions to add to the modx cms.
                    and there is obviouls a very big one that makes me sad about modx.
                    I and I suppose any other developer would love to hape a better template management.
                      • 15826
                      • 160 Posts
                      hey was it was a try to find any functions to add to the modx cms.
                      and there is obviouls a very big one that makes me sad about modx.
                      I and I suppose any other developer would love to hape a better template management.

                      You suppose WAY wrong. Front end devs LOVE ModX (which actually created a bit of a ruckus back about a year or so ago when the backend and the docs weren’t quite ready for all of us who jumped in with both feet!) I’ve templated for a bunch of different dynamic programs-- WordPress, PHPld, Esyndicat, Drupal, TextPattern, CubeCart, Zencart, Joomla, Joomla/Virtuemart, etc. . . . and ModX is pretty much the easiest to template of all of them, with no frontend code decisions forced on us from backend, no stupid overrides, nor any of the other idiocies other dynamic programs force on us. It’s also the most flexible, allowing me to easily template different areas of the site differently, hell-- different areas of each DOCUMENT differently if I wish, and allows me to create a completely tableless and accessible site with most any of the bells and whistles I might want. It also gives me three different ways to structure content additions (chunks, templates, snippets) which, in various combinations, allow me to make this pup jump through multiple hoops. Better template management compared to what? Hands down, ModX gives me the most flexibility in making the frontend look exactly the way I wish it to, compared to any other dynamic program I’ve templated.

                      I suspect you might not truly understand how ModX templating really works if you’re making a statement like that.
                        "I’d love to change the world but I can’t find the source code . . ."

                        Custom ModX Templates