-
☆ A M B ☆
- 24,524 Posts
http://www.willowgarden.org/
Interesting. Very interesting.
Not the prettiest web site I’ve seen - very 80’s, 20 errors on the main page - I usally stop at the errors, a couple are ok, but 20’s too many to bother looking at the rest of the site. It suggests a couple of things that are a turn-off for me... lack of attention to detail, tardiness, perhaps worse - like, they don’t know how to markup a document correctly *shudder*
-
MODX Staff
- 10,725 Posts
I love the defensive stance out of the gate with a page called Answering Our Critics, at the end of which he describes that "...but one thing I definitely know I’m good at is Web design, and by extension, Web site architecture." And after considering that the markup of the page doesn’t validate, I’d be really curious to know how that extends into the architecture (though I’d hope there would be no correlation).
At the same time, I see myself as about to go through some of the same criticisms in regards to presenting MODx 1.0 as both a content management and rapid application development framework, so there is definitely some applicable lessons embodied in the WillowGarden site. Plus, I love to review frameworks, so I’ll try and look under the hood and give you my comments on the code itself when I get a chance.
-
☆ A M B ☆
- 24,524 Posts
Ah, yes. I didn’t mean the framework itself was interesting, I didn’t even look into it (no PHP 5 here) but the whole approach and attitude was very interesting.