Hi,
coming via
Andreas Viklund´s blog to a
CSS framework contest (and a long planned, never begun MODx template in mind) I just finished a set of templates,
but before submitting them I would like to ask you guys for a quick review of them (especially MAC and Linux users: does safari, konqueror work and perhaps MAC/IE?) I tried IE5,IE5.5,IE6.0,FF and Opera, but a MAC isn´t available here in my office, so...
The sense of this contest is (similar to CSS Zengarden) to use only one HTML file with the same content for different designs. The HTML file is mostly accessible (but I think the creator has to do some fine tuning) and all the rest is done with CSS. So for example the content comes before the menu etc. (just look in the source code). The new thing - in comparison to ZEN garden - is that you use several Stylesheets, where only one is changed for layouting. The others (like typo, general layout stuff, form elements etc.) stay the same. I think with some work on that it would also be possible to integrate this in MODx with several documents for the Stylesheets, choosing layout just with the change of one TV for example
Okay, enough written, here are the 6 layouts:
Navigation on the left, 1 column content
simple case: navigation on the left, 1 column content
Navigation on the left, 2 columns content
they put some "additional content" called "sub" in the source, in this case shown on the right.
Topnavigation, one column content + local navigation on top
All the elements shown, but only one column. The local links are a bit silly and hard to design, so I put them in a bit boring way on the top of the content.
Topnavigation, one column content + local navigation on the right
Classic "split menu"
Topnavigation, two column content + local navigation on the right
Again all elements, this time with a top navigation.
Topnavigation, 2 columns content
Same without the local navigation.
While doing this stuff today, I heavily thought about the sense of these 6 given Layouts (meaning 6 different Stylesheets are given), I don´t think it´s the best choice, but I think it´s a beginning in different (buzzwording) web2.0. -whatever-thinking

And I know it´s not valid HTML (nor CSS at the moment), but hey, this is not my Source (okay - CSS needs to be tuned tomorrow)
Hope I can get some critics or suggestions, deadline is sunday
Regards,
Marc