Quote from: aspeum at Apr 02, 2008, 07:43 AM
Sorry to pop in : this thread is very interesting ! Can you elaborate about the paragraph I quote ? I don’t quite understand your last sentence... Do you mean you went too far in ignoring what seem to be irrelevant stuff ? And what’s the connection between "The Four Hour Work Week" (haven’t read it) and "GTD" (read it) ? Are their philosophy contradictory ?
Thanks 
Well to elaborate on the last sentence, there was a point where I would read a few very inspiring blogs every morning from Steve Pavlina to Guy Kawasaki to Rajesh Setty to Tom Peters. They got me excited about taking action, thinking boldly and controlling my day.
When I started trying to increase productivity I turned to GTD (Getting Things Done by David Allen) and picked up some productivitybut felt I spent a lot of time spinning wheels. I eventually read FHWW (Four Hour Work Week) in which Tim Ferriss discussed selective ignorance. Ignoring all those things that weren’t necessary and instead of processing all the inflows, eliminating most of the inflows (this is a missing part of GTD in my opinion) so I went on an information fast. Ferriss doesn’t say don’t do it but do it if it needs to be done not because it is there or get someone else to do it.
So the relationship between the two books is a comparison and contrast on viewpoints on productivity. Allen shows you how to get everything done but Ferriss shows you to get rid of most of that everything, delegate or automate so it is no longer seeking your attention. The ends for each book are very different. GTD aims to get you to work effectively and efficiently (but fails to enable you to eliminate) and FHWW book aims to free you from work, create a muse income and allow you to pursue mini-retirements and and shift your lifestyle.
On the back of FHWW it suggests that you "Don’t read this book unless you want to quit your job". That is a bit extreme but it suggests that much of what we do is busy work, as part of the middle class social construct that we work for 40 or 50 years and then retire. Ferriss makes a valid argument that it is silly to waste away our most vital years working and then try to "live" when we have sore knees, backs and are burned out from working for 40 years. This I agree wholeheartedly with and am working toward that end.
Hope this all makes sense.
Cheers,
Jay