It’s certainly an attractive site. Though I’m no oenophile, I can appreciate the eye candy!
Rather than guess or worry about SEO, try a few experiments, maybe 45 to 60 or so.
According to
Nielsen NetRatings as reported by the Dallas Google Guru, searches in the United States upon Google, Yahoo plus MSN engines add up to 91% of the total. (The same top three captured 83% of the total in 2006, so the oligopolistic trend has only intensified.) Unless you have good reason to believe that Web search in Scottsdale is atypical, you expect considerable non-U.S. interest in your business, or you know that there is some small but important wine-oriented search engine to consider, you can restrict the study to the three top U.S. search providers without fear of being misled.
Therefore, create a table that looks something like this:
[table]
[tr]
[td]Search Keyword
[/td]
[td]Google Rank
[/td]
[td]Yahoo Rank
[/td]
[td]MSN / Bing Rank
[/td]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td]custom wine racking
[/td]
[td]47
[/td]
[td]1
[/td]
[td]
[/td]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td]wine racking
[/td]
[td]
[/td]
[td]
[/td]
[td]
[/td]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td]cellar cooling systems
[/td]
[td]
[/td]
[td]
[/td]
[td]
[/td]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td]whisperkool
[/td]
[td]
[/td]
[td]
[/td]
[td]
[/td]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td]split system
[/td]
[td]
[/td]
[td]
[/td]
[td]
[/td]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td]wine storage
[/td]
[td]
[/td]
[td]
[/td]
[td]
[/td]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td]wine cabinet
[/td]
[td]
[/td]
[td]
[/td]
[td]
[/td]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td]vintique racking
[/td]
[td]
[/td]
[td]
[/td]
[td]
[/td]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td]commercial wine racking
[/td]
[td]
[/td]
[td]
[/td]
[td]
[/td]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td]cellar design
[/td]
[td]
[/td]
[td]
[/td]
[td]
[/td]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td]custom cellars
[/td]
[td]
[/td]
[td]
[/td]
[td]
[/td]
[/tr]
[tr]
[td]And maybe 5 to 10 more
[/td]
[td]
[/td]
[td]
[/td]
[td]
[/td]
[/tr]
[/table]
Do the keywords above seem familiar? I lifted them from your site’s source code. You could brainstorm more keywords, jot down keywords that your customers and suppliers use to describe your offering and even examine the keywords on competitors’ Web sites.
Now the tedious part: For each keyword, perform a search using each search engine. For each search result, count down to the first citation that points to your Web site. Record that number in the table. (I took a look at Google and Yahoo, then entered a couple of results above.)
If page ranks on many of the keywords that matter to prospective customers are low, you are doing great. If not, you have more work to do, as Susan indicates.
I did one of these studies last week for a Japanese manufacturer of some wonderful products who has struggled to break into the U.S. market. I found that their page ranks numbered in the hundreds(!) for most keywords that they deemed important. No wonder that no one finds their Web site unless they already know the company’s name!
The exceptions were rather odd English acronyms the company had coined to describe their products and business. Since no one else in the world, customers included, used these keywords, they ranked absolutely
ichiban on them.
Anyway, as you add content and trade links with others, keep testing your site’s page ranks. You should expect to see improvement.
Hints
Your site’s keywords don’t mention geography. Throw in some Scottsdale and Arizona references in the above test keywords and see how your page ranks look. Pretty good, I’ll bet. And that’s relevant, right? You aren’t likely to install a custom wine cellar in Schenectady, NY after all.
Schenectady? That reminds me: Do you find that customers misspell certain keywords? (Such as "vintique," perhaps?) If so, add those
misspellings to your site’s keyword list. It won’t make you look dumb or foolish. It might provide a few "hits" you wouldn’t receive otherwise.