When you are logged in and not in the manager, Modx modifies the code of the public page for you to include the quick edit bar.
If you build a valid template, and are not logged in, what you see will be valid.
Thank you very much for your patient responses. I understand a little better now.
My objective was to try and convince a rather stubborn set of Internet professionals as well as lay decision makers to use Modx or at the least stay away from some other inflexible and one expensive CMS. I have partially succeeded but the responsibility of designing the site is now on my table.
I have never used a computer for more than menu driven application packages related to my regular work. I am however able to work with Modx and hope to learn a new trade in the process.
I have since changed the template from ModXHost. I have ported Wolfgang’s Multiflex 3 column template to modx.
Now I am working on more little nags in the new template .
By now I am confident enough not to ask for help before trying.
-
MODX Staff
- 12,272 Posts
I believe there’s a fairly in depth port of Multiflex already done ... with lots of comments discussing how to do things. You might search for it for ideas too.
Ryan Thrash, MODX Co-Founder
Follow me on Twitter at @rthrash or catch my occasional unofficial thoughts at thrash.me
Regarding search snippets, Hyperflexsearchform makes a good substitute for AjaxSearch, and I’ve found it a lot more flexible (you can search groups of documents or those using specific templates). My version also searches Maxigallery descriptions and my half-built native forum code as well - I need to get that uploaded to the repository here at some point.
Regarding QuickEdit - if you don’t want it, you can easily disable it through the modules menu in the manager (Modules/Manage Modules - click on Quick Edit and set Module Disabled). It was one of the first things I did when I ran into validation issues.
Jon
Thank you .
I didn’t realize that multiflex was already ported. I looked at the porting and found answers to my remaining problems.
I have one question.
I had ported the template without breaking it up into chunks and it seems to work fine. I understand that breaking it up into chunks allows a lot of flexibility. Are there any other advantages in breaking a complex template into many chunks? or conversely, will i or my users run into any problems later if i dont break it up?
Thanks for all the support people. I never cease to wonder at the magic of open source communities. Total strangers, pitching in, helping out, supporting each other from all over the world. This is one example I would never stop talking about to my trainees.
I have found little need for chunks, personally. They work great it you have a lot of templates with sections of code that need to be the same across the board (like a footer). Your design will work just fine not using chunks, and it is easy to add them later if you find you need the flexibility.
An added benefit I could see is that you can train non-administrator users to update chunks without looking at the HTML template. Perhaps in a scenario where the chunk represents contact information that might change.