Quote from: rthrash at Jan 30, 2009, 01:18 PM
I’ve updated the entry and posted an argument for maintaining the article in Wikipedia. Hopefully whomever it is that keeps marking the entry for deletion can appreciate that there are in fact a lot of people that consider MODx noteworthy for inclusion.
I’m afraid it still reads like an advertisement for MODx, with a lot of marketing terms and phrases like "sensible," extendable," "robust," and "easy." If you analyze the article from a neutral standpoint, it’s clear that it’s primary goal is to promote MODx rather than to describe it, so the article may still be at risk of deletion.
That said, the Drupal and Mambo Wiki pages are very similar in tone and should be also removed if the MODx page is deleted for that reason. The Joomla page is a little more neutral.