-
- 24 Posts
4) A whois on 27.209.95.64 tells it's from China. I doubt a company the size of Baidu doesn't have own IP blocks. A quick duckduckgo for "baidu bots ip numbers" suggests Baidu is not involved. HTTP_USER_AGENT is probably spoofed (if the term applies).
% [whois.apnic.net]
% Whois data copyright terms http://www.apnic.net/db/dbcopyright.html
% Information related to '27.192.0.0 - 27.223.255.255'
% Abuse contact for '27.192.0.0 - 27.223.255.255' is '[email protected]'
inetnum: 27.192.0.0 - 27.223.255.255
netname: UNICOM-SD
descr: China Unicom Shandong province network
descr: China Unicom
country: CN
admin-c: CH1302-AP
tech-c: XZ14-AP
mnt-by: APNIC-HM
mnt-lower: MAINT-CNCGROUP
mnt-lower: MAINT-CNCGROUP-SD
mnt-routes: MAINT-CNCGROUP-RR
status: ALLOCATED PORTABLE
remarks: --------------------------------------------------------
remarks: To report network abuse, please contact mnt-irt
remarks: For troubleshooting, please contact tech-c and admin-c
remarks: Report invalid contact via www.apnic.net/invalidcontact
remarks: --------------------------------------------------------
mnt-irt: IRT-CU-CN
last-modified: 2016-05-04T00:22:59Z
source: APNIC
-
- 12 Posts
@scott: thanks, I know about Baidu.
I agree with Hans that this was probably not by Baidu, but a malign access trial nevertheless.
And I am still puzzled about the http response code 200! So I am not yet sure about the answers for 2. and 3. .