IMPORTANT: Testing for next version (v0.6)

The try catch is for php5 only.. What problems were you having with it? (although they will probably go away after phpThumb is integrated)

Yes, you can post the resynch modifications to handle &gal_query_ids parameter.. please post your changes against the current SVN code if you can.

when I have pictures with corrupted exifs the resynch-action breaks and I can not resynch the directory. So with the try/catch block it works (with the wrong date, but its better as no execution.

It seems to be ignoring the &titles_in_overview=`0` parameter as it shows the titles anyway.

I am testing it now. Just want to report back that so far so good 

By the way, I had a mis-conception for Maxigallery because I used to use it in Etomite (or was it call etoGal?!), and I didn’t like it a bit. I am so glad that I have given your Maxigallery a try! Greate work and installation is a charm! Now I am going to try something advanced 

Btw, the version is 0.5.2 is this correct and the latest version from SVN?

Oh! A request here, can you also add jQuery Lightbox?
http://leandrovieira.com/projects/jquery/lightbox

I really feel it loads faster than Protoype ones and the Slimbox. Incentive: it seems many Modx users are jQuery’s fans

Quote from: arty at Jun 06, 2008, 05:49 PM

It seems to be ignoring the &titles_in_overview=`0` parameter as it shows the titles anyway.

That parameter hasn’t been in MaxiGallery snippet for years See the current parameters from MaxiGallery wiki: http://wiki.modxcms.com/index.php/MaxiGallery. If you want to make the picture titles to disappear, make a custom template with the content of the original one, but remove the picture title placeholder.

Quote from: chinesedream at Jun 08, 2008, 02:09 AM

Btw, the version is 0.5.2 is this correct and the latest version from SVN?

Yes, the link at the first post in this thread downloads the most current SVN release. Haven’t updated the version info in MaxiGallery files yet..

Quote from: chinesedream at Jun 08, 2008, 02:09 AM

Oh! A request here, can you also add jQuery Lightbox?
http://leandrovieira.com/projects/jquery/lightbox

I’ll give it a look if it’s free for commercial use also. It’s easy to add your own custom display types into MaxiGallery though.

Quote from: doze at Jun 08, 2008, 09:33 PM

Quote from: chinesedream at Jun 08, 2008, 02:09 AM

Oh! A request here, can you also add jQuery Lightbox?
http://leandrovieira.com/projects/jquery/lightbox

I’ll give it a look if it’s free for commercial use also. It’s easy to add your own custom display types into MaxiGallery though.

Thank you! Good to know that I can add my custom display type.
I’ll see if I am able to dd the project seven’ gallery script.

I’ve followed the wiki for creating my first gallery and added &childembedtype=`smoothgallery` to the snippet call [!MaxiGallery? &display=`childgalleries`!]

On the Gallery1 page I have:

[!MaxiGallery? &pics_per_row=`3` &max_thumb_size=`110` &max_pic_size=`100` &thumb_use_dropshadow=`1` &smoothgallery_useExternalCarousel=`1`&smoothgallery_carouselElement !]

What am I missing for just the basic SmoothGallery?

What are you seeing now in the pages?

The document that has the childgalleries call should show all childgalleries in a smoothgallery gallerysets. If you want to see a smoothgallery in the Gallery1 page too, you need to add &embedtype=`smoothgallery` to that snippet call and remove the &smoothgallery_useExternalCarousel, &smoothgallery_carouselElement and &pics_per_row parameters, unless if you know what they are doing. You also might want to remove the &thumb_use_dropshadow parameter as it will not look good in the smoothgallery picture carousel..

Thanks, this is what I have:

[!MaxiGallery? &embedtype=`smoothgallery` &max_thumb_size=`110` &max_pic_size=`200x400` !]

Still no smoothgallery and the pictures are very large, not 200 x400. I’m using the ` under the ~, is this correct?

You need to re-upload images to see the size change. If you are not using the SVN version, eg. the one linked to this thread, you need to add &display=`embedded` to the snippet call.

And yes, the backtick is correct. If you cannot get it to work, can you give a link to the site for me to check.