Ditto 2.0 Beta 1

3,250 Posts

MARKSVIRTUALDESK Reply #1, 19 years, 8 months ago

All features in this version of Ditto should be fully functional. Furthermore, the bugs in the Alpha releases should be ironed out. Here is the changelog:

[2007-1-16: REVISION 0000]

[FIXED] &tags parameters and tplAlt vs tplFirst assignment
[CHANGED] first and last templates are now the first and last items on a given page, not of all documents

[2007-1-17: REVISION 0000]

[FIXED] &tags parameter
[FIXED] &debug output when no documents found
[FIXED] QE placeholders now correctly add pagetitle field to fields array

[2007-1-18: REVISION 0000]

[FIXED] Advanced sorting

As usual, please test and report any bugs here. Thanks!

7,075 Posts

davidm Reply #2, 19 years, 8 months ago

Great milestone, off to downloading it, and hopefully giving this a test run, at last !

.: COO - Commerce Guys - Community Driven Innovation :.

MODx est l'outil id

MODX Staff
12,272 Posts

Ryan Thrash Reply #3, 19 years, 8 months ago

Any reason not to move this to the public forum? Good work Mark!

Ryan Thrash, MODX Co-Founder
Follow me on Twitter at @rthrash or catch my occasional unofficial thoughts at thrash.me

3,250 Posts

MARKSVIRTUALDESK Reply #4, 19 years, 8 months ago

If no-one finds any bugs with this release, I’m going to release it as Ditto 2.0 Final tomorrow evenening

7,075 Posts

davidm Reply #5, 19 years, 8 months ago

Does that mean it could be bundled with 0.9.5.1 ?
Would be awesome grin

.: COO - Commerce Guys - Community Driven Innovation :.

MODx est l'outil id

MODX Staff
12,272 Posts

Ryan Thrash Reply #6, 19 years, 8 months ago

I suppose that does in fact mean it could be bundled with 0951 laugh

Ryan Thrash, MODX Co-Founder
Follow me on Twitter at @rthrash or catch my occasional unofficial thoughts at thrash.me

2,542 Posts

heliotrope Reply #7, 19 years, 8 months ago

Congrats Mark for this new release.

I had no time today to play with it.
Will try to test tonight and report about my past issues.

:-)

Made with MODx : [url=http://www.copadel.com]copadel, fruits et l

MODX Staff
12,272 Posts

Ryan Thrash Reply #8, 19 years, 8 months ago

Though I still think a public beta would be prudent and have an infinitely higher probability of finding bugs.

Ryan Thrash, MODX Co-Founder
Follow me on Twitter at @rthrash or catch my occasional unofficial thoughts at thrash.me

2,542 Posts

heliotrope Reply #9, 19 years, 8 months ago

Hi Mark,

Could you please explain me how to display the tags value for a TV in doc listing without having to set the &tags param.

For instance, I’ d like the TV value for each doc be rendered in ditto Tpl.
So I’ve inserted the tagLinks in my tpl and added &tagData=`myTV`

here is my chunk:

<div class="photoVig">
[+phx:if=`[+thumbImg+]`:is=``:then=``:else=`<span class="vignette"><a href="[~[+id+]~]"  >[+#thumbImg+]</a></span>`+]
<h4 class="titPhoto">([+id+])<a href="[~[+id+]~]">[+#pagetitle+]</a></h4>
<p>Tags: [+tagLinks+] <br />date:[+createdon:date=`%d %m %Y %R %S`+]<p>
<p>[+#content+]</p>
</div>

And My call:

[!DittoBeta02? &parents=`14526,11552` &summarize=`210` &paginate=`1` &tpl=`photolist2` &tplFirst=`photolistAlt` &tplLast=`photolistAlt` &tplAlt=`photolistAlt` &debug=`1` &depth=`3` &sortBy=`id` &sortDir=`ASC` &hideFolders=`1` &tagDelimiter=`,` &tagData=`tagsPhoto` !]

Ditto return "No document Found".

Is it mandatory to specify all the value of myTV in &tags param to retrieve the docs .
I thought if &tags was not set ditto would return all the documents with a value for this TV and will replace the taglinks placeholder with them.

Am I wrong ?

:-)

Made with MODx : [url=http://www.copadel.com]copadel, fruits et l

3,975 Posts

Zaigham (aka zi) Reply #10, 19 years, 8 months ago

I guess its something to do with:

&tagMode

Method to remove tags, can either be onlyAllTags, removeAllTags, onlyTags, or removeTags.

onlyTags

Zaigham R - MODX Professional | Skype | Email | Twitter

Digging the interwebs for #MODX gems and bringing it to you. modx.link