Well, Raymond said if this gets full dev team approval he would do this for me considering I know nada about the core itself. So everyone approve!
I vote for also !
This really is good use of AJAX : time saver, intuitive for the user, who would vote against ?
The only thing (forgive me to ask stupid question) is do we provide an alternative if javascript is disabled (and does it still have any interrest to do so ?) ?
.: COO - Commerce Guys - Community Driven Innovation :.
MODx est l'outil id
-
☆ A M B ☆
- 24,524 Posts
The whole Manager is so tied up with Javascript, it would pretty much have to be a completely separate "optional" manager package to go without. I’ve worked up one that does almost everything except the document tree without javascript, although some of the action scripts also use a lot of javascript. It’s doable, but is really a totally different animal. I’ve backed off on the work on it since the whole backend will be changing in the next few versions.
Okay Susan, thanks.
I don’t mean we should do it, but was asking if it would be a good idea or not.
.: COO - Commerce Guys - Community Driven Innovation :.
MODx est l'outil id
I like it YES lets do this
Well, note I said for the second option "next to the menu index" so that field would still exist if someone wanted to set it manually.