We launched new forums in March 2019—join us there. In a hurry for help with your website? Get Help Now!
    • 10283
    • 1 Posts
      • 7455
      • 2,204 Posts
      nice work looks really good

      another proof that modx can be used for any design.

      dimmy
        follow me on twitter: @dimmy01
        • 24994
        • 9 Posts
        Quote from: Dimmy at Jun 21, 2007, 12:53 PM

        nice work looks really good

        another proof that modx can be used for any design.

        dimmy

        I agree, modx can be used to do any type of site, im set on that smiley
          • 7231
          • 4,205 Posts
          nice site, cool design, fits the topic well.
            [font=Verdana]Shane Sponagle | [wiki] Snippet Call Anatomy | MODx Developer Blog | [nettuts] Working With a Content Management Framework: MODx

            Something is happening here, but you don't know what it is.
            Do you, Mr. Jones? - [bob dylan]
            • 20382
            • 13 Posts
            Top work! Ditto to using MODx for any type of site - I find myself using modx even when the customer doesn’t require CMS, simply because it’s so fast to get something up and running.
              • 33337
              • 3,975 Posts
              Great! Great work! smiley
                Zaigham R - MODX Professional | Skype | Email | Twitter

                Digging the interwebs for #MODX gems and bringing it to you. modx.link
                • 24421
                • 44 Posts
                Pretty girls, but the site is not CSS valid and not valid XHTML 1.0 Transitional as the !DOCTYPE declare. Some ’.png’ images for users w/o flash or users with ’flashblocker’ active it would be wonderful.
                  • 27708 MODX Staff
                  • 2,502 Posts
                  Quote from: rambat at Jul 30, 2007, 07:59 PM

                  Pretty girls, but the site is not CSS valid and not valid XHTML 1.0 Transitional as the !DOCTYPE declare. Some ’.png’ images for users w/o flash or users with ’flashblocker’ active it would be wonderful.

                  Hmm...new superhero, the Validator! grin

                  Anyhow the site is not bad. Just to make more excuses for the site owner without any real knowledge and that they didn’t even change the doctype and possibly didn’t even care.

                  BTW: I know for a fact that I have an invalid page or two creeping around my past projects.
                    Author of zero books. Formerly of many strange things. Pairs well with meats. Conversations are magical experiences. He's dangerous around code but a markup magician. Blog ✦ Twitter ✦ LinkedIn ✦ GitHub
                    • 24421
                    • 44 Posts
                    You are right, the site is not bad. Perhaps I am too much obsessed with the Web standards. rolleyes

                    Sorry if my commentary has bothered you, was not my intention.
                      • 27708 MODX Staff
                      • 2,502 Posts
                      Rambat,

                      Your commentary has not bothered me at all. I just found it humorous that in every comment you point out (rightly so) that the pages have invalid code. There is absolutely nothing wrong with letting people know that their markup has flaws. Please keep commenting. The only thing I might suggest would be to offer an example of the errors and why they might address them.

                      Keep in mind that there are 10000’s of "designers" and "developers" who don’t know what a validator is let alone how to fix it if it isn’t.

                      You will find that the MODx forums are among the friendliest you will ever find.

                      Keep posting and help make MODx the best CMS/F ever.

                      Jay
                        Author of zero books. Formerly of many strange things. Pairs well with meats. Conversations are magical experiences. He's dangerous around code but a markup magician. Blog ✦ Twitter ✦ LinkedIn ✦ GitHub