• MODX, the GPL and me#

  • rthrash Reply #1, 5 years, 5 months ago

    Reply
    Paraphrased from a discussion about how the GPL affects a person's ability to charge for sites in MODx and how it affects their proprietary snippets/modules (in short, it doesn't so much) ... The conclusion is worth posting a sticky topic, as it seems like this discussion pops up quarterly, as it does on many OS projects. Here's our take on the GPL means for you and for your sites built in MODx:

    Legalities (Letter of the Law) * You can use MODx to develop sites for clients. You can host the site or deliver it to the client to host and no one has to release any code back to the project, including modified MODx code, unless you want to. You have to make the MODx core code available to the client, or at least tell them where to find it. You cannot place restrictions on the customer's right to redistribute said MODx code.
    * If you write snippets as part of developing a site for a client, you don't have to distribute them on GPL if they only call the MODx API and don't change any MODx code. You can distribute them using a closed-source commercial license.
    * If you modify the MODx code (i.e. anything shipped with the MODx tarball/zip-file) for any reason it must be licensed under the GPL if you choose to distribute the changes. Hosting a site is considered distribution.
    * You can make money from any of the above because the GPL is only concerned with distribution.

    Ethics (Spirit of the Law) * MODx is the result of more than 10,000 hours and 2 years (as of Dec '06). We've donated this project and don't require or ask much of the people that use it. We've spent more real dollars that hours too, and have ongoing monthly expenses that are still not fully covered by donations.
    * If you make changes to MODx, please share them back with the community. If you choose not to do so, or try to hide the fact a site is running MODx behind an authenticated Manager login, we simply ask that you abstain from using the support forums for any reason whatsoever. In my personal view, the GPL is not about support, but about sharing.

    We're working on a "private label" MODx license (and support/distribution mechanism) for developers that want a fully brand-able manager, and we hope to have that resolved along with the 1.0 release.



  • davidm Reply #2, 5 years, 5 months ago

    Reply
    Great post Ryan... as we discussed, I'll translate it and I suggest moderators of each local communities do the same, not everybody speaks english...

    PS : it seems you forgot to make it a sticky


  • rthrash Reply #3, 5 years, 5 months ago

    Reply
    LOL ... I could've sworn I had made it sticky, but apparently not. Now it is.


  • davidm Reply #4, 5 years, 5 months ago

    Reply
    I thought it was, but after searching the forums to find this thread back, realized it wasn't... otherwise I wouldn't have noticed either !


  • feary Reply #5, 5 years, 5 months ago

    Reply
    The private label sounds great! Very clever.


  • Bravado Reply #6, 5 years, 5 months ago

    Reply
    "Private Label" makes it sound like a bottle of wine. "Would like a glass of our private label 1999 MODx Cabernet Sauvigon? Or perhaps a pint of our MODx stout on tap?" That's the wonderful thing about the GPL...it gives the developers alot more choices on how software can be used.


  • gadamiak Reply #7, 5 years, 5 months ago

    Reply
    Thanks Ryan for making it explicit. I already translated it into Polish.


  • silent Reply #8, 5 years, 4 months ago

    Reply
    Is there any German translation yet?
    I'd be happy to create one!


  • rthrash Reply #9, 5 years, 4 months ago

    Reply
    I don't think so... that'd be great and thanks!


  • silent Reply #10, 5 years, 4 months ago

    Reply
    You'll get it tomorrow - it's close to midnight in Berlin/GER...