• wish xaraya features to be in modx :P#

  • Xsss4hell Reply #1, 5 years, 1 month ago

    Reply
    I wished:

    All Xaraya features were in modx, but better organized, ajax enabled, accessible, clean, and in a very small package size.
    Not reclame, just a link.
    http://www.xaraya.com/
    Anyone downloading and installing it is wheter a really lavishly enterprises webmaster or just mad. Itz huuge


  • davidm Reply #2, 5 years, 1 month ago

    Reply
    Yeah well, Xaraya is not news for those who use CMS/CMF. I am not sure big enterprises deploy Xaraya, but it's a very ambitious project and you can build pretty complex websites with it, if you get past the learning curve. I have kept tabs on it because of the dynamic data stuff but expected some improvement in the UI departement which never came...

    Which features are not in MODx and are in Xaraya that you'd like to see in MODx ?
    Not sure that there are a lot of those or that they would be hard to implement...

    Dynamic Data ? MODx has TV and it goes beyond IMHO...
    XML-RPC ? Not yet in MODx yeah but it's coming I think someone's working on it. Same goes for LDAP authentification...

    As far as I am concerned, Xaraya has a pretty cluttered and poorly designed admin GUI, a bit like Drupal its logic is somewhat different from other CMS (so is MODx, but at least you get nice results fast ).


  • Xsss4hell Reply #3, 5 years, 1 month ago

    Reply
    true words,
    wise man.

    It has a poor backend.


  • kickass Reply #4, 5 years ago

    Reply
    Not to mention that, like Drupal, you have to swallow a Jargon Dictionary to be able to do the least little thing with it. Both these programs are easier to skin than to use, which is why I don't recommend for clients (while I recommend ModX all the time


  • kudolink Reply #5, 5 years ago

    Reply
    I've done a site with Xaraya, www.dallasimmobiliare.it. It took a month to me to learn and some things (like the contact form which is, in fact, the Xaraya registration) needed an excamotage because I can't figure how to make it with that system.
    Maybe it has many chances but (I fully agree with kickass) it's a pain to do very simple things.
    By the way, from Xaraya came my hate to conditional comments: your work ends up in a enormous template hard to mantain over time (without talking about leaving the work to others!) just to display a single page.
    Their Dynamic Data can be very interesting, but it's pretty hard to take advantage of without a line of explanation and no community behind.
    Because there's no community behind... void forums... no-one replies to emails... (well, this is just my experience with them)
    And after all the possibilities, passing the "vertical" learning curve, what you get? To be chained in "articles", "reviews" and similar kind of organization.
    Well, Postnuke can do the same and now with the last template engines can provide pretty xhtml output too, with about no learning difficulties and a wide range of addons.
    This leaving apart problems like the horror admin interface (and there is someone that talks bad of MODx admin interface? Have you ever used, or seen the Xaraya's? I don't think so) and the slowness.

    If the client of the above site asks for a change in the site, surely I'll convert it in MODx to do the change.


  • doze Reply #6, 5 years ago

    Reply
    Quote from: kudolink at Jan 25, 2007, 12:31 PM
    I've done a site with Xaraya, www.dallasimmobiliare.it.
    I'm just seeing this from that url:

    Parse error: syntax error, unexpected '<' in /www/MW_qPPRanncq/dallasimmobiliare.it/index.php on line 180


  • kudolink Reply #7, 5 years ago

    Reply
    It's incredible. Something has truncated the index.php this morning.
    It's pure luck we've speak about Xaraya just today!

    Thank you doze: I didn't look at the site when I wrote the url.


  • PaulGregory Reply #8, 5 years ago

    Reply
    OK. But returning to the original post, what features *does* xaraya have that MODx does not?


  • Xsss4hell Reply #9, 5 years ago

    Reply
    oh it seems, nothing is comparable to modx.
    but there was always someone who did it's job better,
    until modx.
    maybe any "enemy" is terminated in this case
    hey was it was a try to find any functions to add to the modx cms.
    and there is obviouls a very big one that makes me sad about modx.
    I and I suppose any other developer would love to hape a better template management.


  • kickass Reply #10, 5 years ago

    Reply
    hey was it was a try to find any functions to add to the modx cms.
    and there is obviouls a very big one that makes me sad about modx.
    I and I suppose any other developer would love to hape a better template management.

    You suppose WAY wrong. Front end devs LOVE ModX (which actually created a bit of a ruckus back about a year or so ago when the backend and the docs weren't quite ready for all of us who jumped in with both feet!) I've templated for a bunch of different dynamic programs-- WordPress, PHPld, Esyndicat, Drupal, TextPattern, CubeCart, Zencart, Joomla, Joomla/Virtuemart, etc. . . . and ModX is pretty much the easiest to template of all of them, with no frontend code decisions forced on us from backend, no stupid overrides, nor any of the other idiocies other dynamic programs force on us. It's also the most flexible, allowing me to easily template different areas of the site differently, hell-- different areas of each DOCUMENT differently if I wish, and allows me to create a completely tableless and accessible site with most any of the bells and whistles I might want. It also gives me three different ways to structure content additions (chunks, templates, snippets) which, in various combinations, allow me to make this pup jump through multiple hoops. Better template management compared to what? Hands down, ModX gives me the most flexibility in making the frontend look exactly the way I wish it to, compared to any other dynamic program I've templated.

    I suspect you might not truly understand how ModX templating really works if you're making a statement like that.